江汉学术 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 37-48.doi: 10.16388/j.cnki.cn42-1843/c.2016.05.005

• 法律专栏_法治中国建设的新视域与新话语 • 上一篇    下一篇

犯罪二次性违法特征的理论与实践再探讨

江奥立1,杨兴培2   

  1. 1上海市人民检察院第一分院 公诉处,上海 200052;2华东政法大学 法律学院,上海 200042
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-06 修回日期:2016-06-06 出版日期:2016-10-15 发布日期:2016-10-11
  • 作者简介:江奥立, 男, 浙江温州人, 上海市人民检察院第一分院公诉处检察官; 杨兴培, 男, 上海人, 华东政法大学法律学院教授, 博士生导师。

A Restudy of the Theories and Practice of the Features of Crime’ s Second Offense against the Law

JIANG Aoli1,YANG Xingpei2   

  1. 1Public Prosecution Office,1st Division,Shanghai People’ s Procuratorate Shanghai 200052;2 School of Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042
  • Received:2016-06-06 Revised:2016-06-06 Online:2016-10-15 Published:2016-10-11

摘要: 犯罪的二次性违法理论已初具其型, 但我们还有必要对这一理论中前置性法与刑法之间如何契合、 在何种程度上进行衔接等问题作进一步的阐述和释解。犯罪的二次性违法理论事实上是刑法 “二次性” 规范属性进一步延伸和分解的结果, 把握刑法与其他部门法之间的关系是深化谦抑理念的关键。应受刑罚处罚性的价值在于强调刑法的保障性, 这就意味着刑罚的设置需要考量前置性法的适用情况。犯罪的二次性违法理论以 “前置性法——刑法” 的递进模式开展自己的叙述, 时刻把刑法的启用看作是充分考量前置性法以后做出的选择, 可见这一理论是建构在 “实证”而非 “经验” 的基础上, 因此具有方法论上的科学性。犯罪的二次性违法理论以法律关系为切入点,通过建构 “前置性法——刑法” 的递进模式进行思考, 其中带来的最重要的理论意义是, 强调对 “法环境” 的考察与解析。犯罪的二次性违法理论主要是基于自由刑法的立场, 始终从法体系的角度把握刑法是保障法、 具有第二次性违法的规范属性, 在刑事立法与刑事司法中均具有重要的指导意义。

关键词: 二次性违法, 前置性法, 刑法, 制裁性规则群, 刑事司法, 刑事立法

Abstract: The theory of crime’ s second offense against the law is taking shape,but it is still necessary to elaborate on how and to what degree the theory’s prepositive laws tally with the criminal law. This theory is actually the result of the extension and decomposition of the the criminal law’ s“second”normative attribute;properly handling the relationship between the criminal law and departmental laws is the key to deepening the tolerant spirit. The value of criminal penalty lies in the protective nature of the criminal law and the adoption of criminal penalty should consider the application of prepositive laws. The theory is recounted in the progressive model of“prepositive laws——criminal law”,always treating the criminal law as the last option after full consideration of prepositive laws. This theory is obviously based on “evidence” rather than “experience”, and thus scientific methodologically. The most important theoretical significance is its emphasis on examining and analyzing the“legal environment”and is important in guiding criminal legislation and justice.

Key words: second offense against the law, prepositive laws, criminal law, punishing regulation group, criminal justice;criminal legislation

中图分类号: