江汉学术 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 35-41.doi: 10.16388/j.cnki.cn42-1843/c.2017.06.005

• 法 律 • 上一篇    下一篇

从聂树斌案看“疑罪从无”如何服众

闵丰锦   

  1. 西南政法大学 法学院,重庆 401120
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-05 修回日期:2017-07-05 出版日期:2017-12-15 发布日期:2017-11-13
  • 作者简介:闵丰锦,男,河南南阳人,西南政法大学法学院博士生,重庆市南岸区人民检察院助理检察员。

How Will the Principle of Presuming Innocent Convince the Public:A Study Based on the Nie Shubin Case

MIN Fengjing   

  1. School of Law, Southwest University of Political science and Law, Chongqing, 401120
  • Received:2017-07-05 Revised:2017-07-05 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2017-11-13

摘要: 聂树斌案再审以疑罪从无的方式判决无罪后,依旧存在一定“只是法律无罪,可能事实有罪”的“聂树斌可能是真凶”之观点。部分民众的不理解,体现了司法机关对疑罪从无在说理服众方面的欠缺。在一个对客观真相孜孜以求的国度之中,真凶尚未归案是疑罪从无难以服众的表面原因,对无罪推定的误读才是疑罪从无难以服众的根本原因。既要以个案为载体加强释法说理工作,更要在我国刑事诉讼法再次修改之际明确写入无罪推定原则,真正使得疑罪从无的无罪判决令人信服。

关键词: 聂树斌, 聂树斌案, 无罪推定, 疑罪从无, 刑事诉讼

Abstract: After the Nie Shubin case was retried and announced not guilty of criminal charges, some people still have such views as“only legally innocent but guilty in fact and Nie might be the murderer”; these views reflect that the principle of presuming the accused innocent unless he is proven guilty cannot completely convince the public. In a country where the objective truth is tirelessly sought, the real criminal having not yet been brought to justice can be the superficial cause of the failure to convince the public, the fundamental cause is people’s misinterpretation of the principle. This paper suggests that to make acquittals based on presumption of innocence convincing, more work should be done to interpret the law to the public through individual law cases and the principle of presuming innocent be written into the criminal procedure law when it is amended.

Key words: Nie Shubin, Nie Subin case, presuming innocent, criminal procedure

中图分类号: