《春秋经传集解》点校商榷

江汉学术 ›› 2012, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 43-46.

《春秋经传集解》点校商榷

方韬

北京师范大学历史学院，北京100875

收稿日期:2011-06-17 出版日期:2012-02-29 发布日期:2013-10-24
作者简介:方韬，男，陕西汉中人，北京师范大学历史学院博士后。
基金资助:
中国博士后科学基金第四十八批资助项目“杜预《春秋经传集解》研究”(20100480221)

A Discussion to the Proofreading of the New Edition ofthe Spring and Autumn Annals Variorum

FANG Tao

School of History, Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China

Received:2011-06-17 Online:2012-02-29 Published:2013-10-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 杜预《春秋经传集解》是《左传》学史上最重要的著作,而上海古籍出版社点校本《春秋经传集解》是现今最通行的《左传》杜预注本。但该书在校勘标点上时有疏忽,问题主要有三:一是沿袭丛刊本之误;二是校点时有可商;三是《经典释文》混入《集解》。

关键词: 《左传》, 杜预, 《春秋经传集解》, 点校

Abstract: Du Yu’s the Spring and Autumn Annals Variorum is the most important work in the Zuo Zhuan study history,which most popular edition is the one published by Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House. But there are some mistakes in the proofreading of the new edition,which mainly contains three:the old mistakes of the old version;punctuation errors;some text in Jingdian Shiwen being mixed into the variorum.

Key words: Zuo Zhuan, Du Yu, the Spring and Autumn Annals Variorum, Proofreading

中图分类号:

K231.04

方韬. 《春秋经传集解》点校商榷[J]. 江汉学术, 2012, 31(1): 43-46.

FANG Tao. A Discussion to the Proofreading of the New Edition ofthe Spring and Autumn Annals Variorum[J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2012, 31(1): 43-46.

[1]	孙旭红. 吕祖谦《左传》学中的王霸之辨[J]. 江汉学术, 2010, 29(2): 89-93.
[2]	邵春驹. 《南史》点校商榷(之二)[J]. 江汉学术, 2009, 28(1): 82-84.
[3]	王国雨. 也论《左传》与孔子——与吴荣曾先生商榷[J]. 江汉学术, 2008, 27(5): 78-81.
[4]	黄觉弘. 《左传》成书战国说综考[J]. 江汉学术, 2006, 25(6): 85-89.
[5]	黄觉弘. 刘知几论《左传》[J]. 江汉学术, 2005, 24(2): 24-27.