Comprehensively On  Compliers of Anchology

Abstract

Abstract: Gujin Shiren Xiuju Xu “Xiaotong, Prince Zhaoming, Liu Xiaochuo and other people compiled Wenxuan ” quoted from Preface to The Refined Sentences Of Ancient And Modern Poets and “Prince Zhaoming, He Xun and Liu Xiaochuo compiled Wenxuan together” annotated in Resurgence Bibliography are the main objective materials cited by most scholars to prove that Xiaotong, Liu Xiaochuo and other people are the compilers of Wenxuan , which, however, is not discriminatively analyzed from the aspect of the fidelity of literature. The two objective materials prove to be untenable if analyzed from the aspect of the fidelity of literature. Wenxuan is not compiled by Prince Zhaoming, Liu Xiaochuo and other people but by Prince Zhaoming alone.

Key words: Wenxuan, complier, the fidelity of literature, Preface To The Refined Sentences Of Ancient And Modern Poets, note from Resurgence Bibliograph

CLC Number:

I206.2

LI Zhi. Comprehensively On Compliers of Anchology[J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2005, 24(1): 33-40.

References

[1] 曹道衡.汉魏六朝文学论文集[C] .桂林:广西师范大学出版社,1999.
[2] 王利器.文镜秘府论校注[M] .北京:中国社会科学出版社,1983.
[3] 中国文选学研究会郑州大学古籍整理研究所编.文选学新论[C] .郑州:中州古籍出版社,1997.
[4] 穆克宏.昭明文选研究[M] .北京:人民文学出版社,1998.
[5] 傅刚.《昭明文选》研究[M] .北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
[6] 力之.关于《文选》编目次第之“彼此失照”问题[J] .广西师范大学学报,2004,(1).
[7] 萧统.文选[C] .北京:中华书局,1977(李注胡刻本).
[8] 吴则虞.晏子春秋集释[M] .北京:中华书局,1962.
[9] 焦循.孟子正义[M] .北京:中华书局,1987.
[10] 陈奇猷.吕氏春秋校释[M] .上海:学林出版社,1984.
[11] 何宁.淮南子集释[M] .北京:中华书局,1998.
[12] 王先谦.后汉书集解:下[M] .北京:中华书局,1984（影印本）.
[13] 刘昫.旧唐书[M] .北京:中华书局,1975.
[14] 萧统.文选[C] .上海:商务印书馆（《四部丛刊》影宋“六臣注”本）.
[15] [英] 罗素.西方哲学史:上卷[M] .北京:商务印书馆,1963.
[16] 力之.关于《文选》的编者问题[J] .文学评论,1999,(1).
[17] 澁江全善,森立之.经籍访古志[M] .光绪11年,徐承祖本.
[18] 屈守元.《文选》导读[M] .成都:巴蜀书社,1993.
[19] 傅刚.《文选》版本研究[M] .北京:北京大学出版社,2000.
[20] 何文焕.历代诗话:上[M] .北京:中华书局,1981.
[21] 四库全书[Z] .上海:上海古籍出版社,1987(影印文渊阁本).
[22] 王象之.舆地纪胜[Z] .北京:中华书局,1992（据道光二十九年刊板影印）.
[23] 高步瀛.文选李注义疏[M] .北京:中华书局,1985.
[24] 方师铎.传统文学与类书之关系[M] .天津:天津古籍出版社,1986（影印1971年本）.
[25] 袁枚.随园诗话[M] .北京:人民文学出版社,1982.
[26] 李锦全.陶潜评传[M] .南京:南京大学出版社,1998.
[27] 沈玉成.《文选》的选录标准[J] .文学遗产,1984,(2).
[28] 洪兴祖.楚辞补注[M] .北京:中华书局,1983.
[29] 姜亮夫.楚辞学论文集[C] .上海:上海古籍出版社,1984.
[30] 俞绍初,许逸民.中外学者文选学论集:[C] .北京:中华书局,1998.
[31] 赵福海,等.昭明文选研究论文集[C] .长春:吉林文史出版社,1988.
[32] 刘师培.中国中古文学史[M] .北京:人民文学出版社,1959.
[33] 王利器.文心雕龙校证[M] .上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
[34] 丁福保.历代诗话续编:中[M] .北京:中华书局,1983.
[35] 许学夷.诗源辩体[M] .北京:人民文学出版社,1987.
[36] 张涤华.历代诗文总集选介[M] .上海:上海古籍出版社,1985.
[37] 许逸民.《文选》编撰年代新说[J] .文学遗产,2000,(4).
[38] 王利器.颜氏家训集解[M] .上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
[39] 王重民.敦煌遗书论文集[C] .北京:中华书局,1984.
[40] 赵福海,等.《昭明文选》与中国传统文化[C] .长春:吉林文史出版社,2001.

Comprehensively On Compliers of Anchology

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	. [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2012, 31(4): 86-90.
[2]	. [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2010, 29(5): 51-52.
[3]	JING Hong-lu. Relationship Between Li Shangyin and Linghu Tao and That Between Li’s Poems and the Latter [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2009, 28(5): 56-60.
[4]	ZHANG Hu-sheng. Three Powers to Surpass Oneself [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2008, 27(5): 71-74.
[5]	. [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2008, 27(5): 82-86.
[6]	. [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2008, 27(4): 68-71.
[7]	. [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2008, 27(3): 41-46.
[8]	. [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2008, 27(2): 47-51.
[9]	. [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2008, 27(1): 60-65.
[10]	ZHAO Lei. Study of New Collection of Anecdotes of Famous Personagesand Primordial Visual Angle in Literary History of Wei and Jin Dynasties [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2007, 26(6): 52-55.
[11]	. [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2007, 26(4): 44-49.
[12]	YUE Jin. Comparison of fu Selection BetweenThe Literary Mind And the Carving of The Dragon and Anthology [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2007, 26(3): 74-78.
[13]	JIANG Fang. Dispute About Qu Yuan Between Wang Yi and Ban Gu [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2006, 25(4): 26-29.
[14]	. [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2006, 25(3): 32-35.
[15]	. [J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2006, 25(3): 60-64.