江汉学术 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 105-112.doi: 10.16388/j.cnki.cn42-1843/c.2016.01.013

• 哲学 • 上一篇    下一篇

《檀弓》“有子与子游立”章新解——兼论先秦儒家礼论中的情文矛盾问题

闫宁   

  1. 南昌大学国学院,南昌 330031
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-14 修回日期:2016-04-14 出版日期:2016-02-15 发布日期:2016-01-27
  • 作者简介:闫宁,男,北京人,南昌大学国学院副教授,博士。

A New Interpretation of“You Zi and Zi You”in Tan Gong—— On the Conflicts of Content and Form in the Pre-Qin Confucian Theory of Rites

YAN Ning   

  1. Department of Sinology,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031
  • Received:2016-04-14 Revised:2016-04-14 Online:2016-02-15 Published:2016-01-27

摘要: 春秋以降,礼崩乐坏进程的加剧在一定程度上体现为礼的内容与形式即礼之“情”与“文”间的矛盾。《礼记》中《檀弓》这一章记录了有子因不明丧踊之义,疑其无情而欲去之,子游反驳其说,提出礼有“微情”、“以故兴物”两大特质。旧说多释“微”为“减杀、抑制”,“故”为“礼仪节文”,皆不确。“微”当释为“隐”,“微情”即“情隐于礼”,强调情与礼义皆蕴于礼之仪文度数。“故”即“故事”,体现了礼有源自传统的稳定性。《檀弓》此章凸显了儒家言礼者在情文侧重问题上的重大分歧,子游反对当时出现的单纯重情、片面强调礼义的倾向,在重视仪文的基础上,主张义与数紧密结合,这一思路在荀子《礼论》中亦有体现。

关键词: 《礼记》, 《檀弓》, 情文, 子游, 荀子

Abstract: The increased moral degeneration since the Spring and Autumn Period reflected,to a degree,the conflicts of the ritual content (情) and form (文). The chapter Tan Gong in The Book of Rites recorded that You Zi intended to get rid of the ceremonial funeral proceedings as they were not emotional. Zi You refuted that these proceedings were necessary since they feature“微情”and“以故兴物”. The word“微”was most often interpreted as“to reduce or refrain”and“ 故”as“established formalities”. So these rituals were used to help people refrain from excessive sadness.This interpretation is inaccurate. Instead,“微”should be defined as“conceal”and“微情”as“emotion contained in rituals”. In the same way,“故”means“old or traditional rules or routines”,indicating the stability of conventions.This chapter reveals the disagreement among Confucian scholars over ritual content and form. Zi You opposes too much emphasis on content or righteousness but maintains that both the content and the form should be closely integrated. This thought can be traced in Hsun Tzu’s Rite Theory.

Key words: The Book of Rites , Tan Gong , content and form, Zi You, Hsun Tzu

中图分类号: