江汉学术 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 95-107.doi: 10.16388/j.cnki.cn42-1843/c.2021.03.009

• 法律专栏_法治中国建设的新视域与新话语 • 上一篇    下一篇

联合国视角下跨国公司经营行为的国际系统治理

马忠法,赵思涵   

  1. 复旦大学 法学院,上海 200438
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-22 出版日期:2021-06-15 发布日期:2021-03-13
  • 作者简介:马忠法,男,安徽滁州人,复旦大学法学院教授,博士生导师,E-mail:zfma@fudan.edu.cn;赵思涵,女,甘肃兰州人,复旦大学法学院硕士生,E-mail:sihanzhao9712@foxmail.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“构建人类命运共同体国际法治创新研究”(18ZDA153);国家社会科学基金重点项目“‘人类命运共同体’国际法理论与实践研究”(18AFX025)

Global Systematic Governance of Transnational Corporations from the UN Perspective

MA Zhongfa,ZHAO Sihan   

  1. Law School,Fudan University,Shanghai 200438
  • Received:2020-07-22 Online:2021-06-15 Published:2021-03-13

摘要: 在国际系统治理语境下,实现跨国公司经营行为与国际法之间的良性互动已成为国际社会关注的焦点。在治理规范形式的选择上,“硬法”具有法律拘束力,但“主权成本”较高,易陷于僵化;“软法”给予国家更多自主选择空间,谈判与修正成本较低,能更快适应国际事务变化的需求,但缺乏强制力。且两者的界限并不完全清晰,在国际法治发展过程中趋于模糊,需要相辅相成以共同规制跨国公司的经营行为。软法层面,从《联合国跨国公司行为守则(草案)》的尝试到“全球契约”和《指导原则》,企业社会责任的概念逐渐融入软法治理中,对跨国公司经营行为的规制从开始的笼统概念逐步发展为明确的环境、人权保护责任;硬法层面,跨国公司人权保护条约的谈判面临人权标准等诸多争议,过程较为艰难漫长。而各国在人权机构决议中的态度、对《指导原则》等“软法”文件的国内法实 施、依托软法标准而创设的国际投资条约“投资者社会责任条款”等,表明跨国公司承担社会责任这一规则正逐渐发展为国际习惯法。在联合国体系下,对跨国公司经营行为的治理应当发挥“软法”与“硬法”各自的优势,同国际系统治理实践相结合,推动建立一个更加尊重人类尊严,与自然和谐相处的有序世界。

关键词: 跨国公司, 联合国, 国际治理, 国际法, 企业社会责任

Abstract: In the context of global systematic governance, the constructive interaction between transnational corporate operation and international law has become a global focus. In choosing the form of regulatory governance,the“hard law”has a legal binding power but high in“sovereignty cost”and liableto be rigidified;the“soft law,”though lacking constraint,can give a country more space for independent choice,low in the cost for negotiation and amendment and more adaptable to global changes. The boundary between the two,originally not clear-cut,tends to be blurred in the development process of global rule of law. They should supplement each other to jointly regulate the business behavior of transnational corporations. In terms of the soft law,from The UN Code of Conduct for Transnational Corporations(Draft)to the“global compact”of Guiding Principles,the concept of corporate social responsibility has been gradually integrated into the soft law governance;and the regulation on transnational corporations’business conduct has developed from a general concept to specific environmental and human rights protection responsibilities. In terms of the hard law,the negotiation of transnational corporations on human rights protection compact has to overcome manifold disputes including human rights standards,with the process long and difficult. Yet,the attitudes of various countries in the resolutions of human rights institutions,their implementation of such soft laws as the Guiding Principles in domestic laws,and the “Investor’s Social Responsibility Clauses,”which is a soft law established according to soft law standards,all reflect that the norm that transnational corporations should shoulder up their social responsibility is developing into a customary international law. In the UN system, the governance of multinational corporations should exploit the advantages of both the soft and hard laws;and,in combination with the practice of global systematic governance,promote the construction of an orderly world that respects human dignity and lives harmoniously with nature.

Key words: transnational corporation, the UN, global governance, international law, corporate social responsibility

中图分类号: