江汉大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 34-37.

• 经济学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

对“F-扭曲”命题的再解读

饶逸飞   

  1. 东北财经大学 研究生院, 辽宁 大连 116023
  • 收稿日期:2010-11-02 出版日期:2011-04-12 发布日期:2013-12-31
  • 作者简介:饶逸飞(1986-), 男, 湖北武汉人, 东北财经大学研究生院硕士生, 研究方向:制度经济学、西方经济学。

Re-study of Preposition About “F-distortion”

RAO Yi-fei   

  1. Graduate School, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, Liaoning 116023, China
  • Received:2010-11-02 Online:2011-04-12 Published:2013-12-31

摘要: 对“F-扭曲”命题的再解读表明, 弗里德曼理论的前提假设是在现实性基础上建立, 但是这种假设更强调的是所研究问题现象中关键因素的影响。同时, 弗里德曼认为过分强调现实不利于发现本质规律, 在追求假设的高精度时一定要考虑成本能否弥补收益, 一旦无法弥补则应该采取较为简单的前提假设。因此, 萨缪尔森对弗里德曼假设非现实性与理论的有效性之间的关系在理解上存在偏差, 而“F-扭曲”不存在。

关键词: 前提假设, 理论, F-扭曲

Abstract: Re-study of preposition about “F-distortion” shows that the presumption of Friedmann theory is established on the realistic base, but the presumption emphasizes more the influence of the critical element occurring in the subject. At the same time, Friedman believes that excessively emphasizing reality is harmful to exposing essence rules. In the process of obtaining assumed intensive accuracy, the problem that whether the cost can make up profit should be considered. Once the cost fails to make up the profits, a relatively simple presumption can be adopted. Thus, Samuelson has deflectively understood relationship between the fabulosity of Friedmann assumption and its theoretical effectiveness, thus no “F-distortion” exists.

Key words: presumption, theory, F-distortion

中图分类号: