江汉大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 5-9.

• 政治学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

利己主义或是集体主义

卢军   

  1. 长江大学马克思主义学院,湖北荆州434023
  • 出版日期:2012-02-29 发布日期:2013-10-24
  • 作者简介:卢军(1965-),男,湖北荆州人,长江大学马克思主义学院副教授,主要从事马克思主义基本原理研究。

Selfishness or Collectivism——On Debate about Man between Single Person and His Possession and German Ideology

LU Jun   

  1. Marxism College of Changjiang University, Jingzhou 434023, Hubei, China
  • Online:2012-02-29 Published:2013-10-24

摘要: 马克思、恩格斯在《德意志意识形态》中从麦克斯·施蒂纳哲学的唯心主义基础,由这种唯心主义必然导致的唯心史观及这种唯心史观必然催生的抽象的人三个环节对“唯一者”进行了彻底的批判。科学地论证了唯物史观视野中的现实人不会永远驻留于抽象人的利己主义,利己主义在某种程度上的确反映了“狭隘的德国小资产阶级生存状态”,但集体主义才代表现实人的真正未来。集体主义的生成不是一种善良的愿望,而是一种客观的实践进程。文本研究的结论是:相信利己主义万古长存与相信在中国目前的经济社会发展水平上通过说教就能够全面消除利己主义而建构真实的而不是威权的集体主义,同样是违背唯物史观的。

关键词: 《唯一者及其所有物》, 利己主义, 《德意志意识形态》, 集体主义

Abstract: In the work of German Ideology, Marx and Engels have completely criticized “single person” from three links of the Max Shidina’s idealistic basis, the idealist conception of history inevitably caused by his idealism and the abstract man inevitably produced by his idealist conception of history. They have scientifically expounded and proved that the real man in the sight of idealist conception of history can never be fixed as figure of selfishness of abstract man, that selfishness has in a certain degree reflected “existent state of narrow German petty bourgeoisie” and that only collectivism represents future of the real man. The growth of collectivism is not a kind wish, but an objective practice progress. The conclusion of the text is: It is against materialist conception of history to believe everlasting of selfishness and to believe to construct realistic society only by eliminating selfishness through persuasion, not by authoritarian collectivism in the present Chinese economic social developing level.

Key words: Single person and his Possession, selfishness, German Ideology, collectivism