江汉大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 26-37.doi: 10.16387/j.cnki.42-1867/c.2023.05.003

• 社会治理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

激励机制、治理界面与业主委员会的极化现象及其治理

刘景琦   

  1. 郑州大学 政治与公共管理学院,河南 郑州 450001
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-28 出版日期:2023-10-28 发布日期:2025-01-06
  • 作者简介:刘景琦,男,郑州大学政治与公共管理学院讲师,武汉大学中国乡村治理研究中心研究人员。
  • 基金资助:
    2023 年度河南省高校人文社会科学研究一般项目“党建引领物业管理的治理效应与优化路径研究”(2023-ZZJH-263)

Incentive Mechanism,Governance Interface,and Polarization of Proprietors’Committee and Its Governance

LIU Jingqi   

  • Received:2023-07-28 Online:2023-10-28 Published:2025-01-06

摘要: 在业主委员会的实际运作中,仅有极端热心公益的业主精英或者谋利型业主精英留在业委会中,形成业委会的极化现象。研究发现,业委会职位带来的激励是业委会成员行为的动力来源,双方互动所处的治理界面则是影响激励效果的决定因素。社会激励需要在“屏幕政治”这一治理界面中产生,而经济激励只需要在“黑箱政治”中完成。“屏幕政治”过程降低了业主实现社会激励的积极性,而“黑箱政治”过程增加了业主获得经济激励的可能性,这是业委会出现极化现象的根源。

关键词: 业主委员会;激励机制;治理界面;业主自治;物业矛盾

Abstract: In practical operation,the polarization of members in proprietors’committees is formed when only extremely civic-minded home owners and profit-oriented owners remain in the committee. The research finds that the incentive brought by the positions in the committee is the power source of committee members’behavior,and the governance interface in which both parties interact is the determinant that affects the incentive effect. While social incentive needs to be generated in the governance interface of screen politics,economic incentive only needs to be achieved in“black-box politics.”The“screen politics”process reduces owners’motivation to achieve social incentives,but the“black-box politics”process increases the possibility of economic incentives for owners. This is the source of polarization in a proprietors’committee.

Key words: proprietors’committee;incentive mechanism;governance interface;proprietors’autonomy; conflict in property service

中图分类号: