江汉学术 ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 40-48.doi: 10.16388/j.cnki.cn42-1843/c.2019.01.005

• 法律专栏_法治中国建设的新视域与新话语 • 上一篇    下一篇

代孕协议的法律效力研究

张 融   

  1. 湖南师范大学 法学院,长沙 410006
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-09 修回日期:2019-02-09 出版日期:2019-02-15 发布日期:2019-01-29
  • 作者简介:张 融,男,广西浦北人,湖南师范大学法学院博士生。
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省研究生科研创新项目“民法典体系下婚姻家庭法的立法价值取向研究”(CX2016B146)

On the Legal Validity of Surrogacy Agreement

ZHANG Rong   

  1. School of Law,Hunan Normal University ,Changsha 410006
  • Received:2019-02-09 Revised:2019-02-09 Online:2019-02-15 Published:2019-01-29

摘要: 代孕协议的效力认定,在我国学术界和司法界引起了极大的争议。从本质上说,代孕协议系法律行为的一种类别,因而在效力认定上其可适用法律行为的效力理论。传统观点认为,代孕协议因违背行政规章或公序良俗原则而被认定为无效。此观点从表面上看似乎符合法律行为的效力理论,但是从实质而言,却背离了立法的精神要义以及社会的实际情况。事实上,代孕协议不仅符合法律行为中的合法性要件,而且也不违背公序良俗原则的内 涵要求。假使对代孕协议的效力予以否认,那么将会给代孕协议的双方当事人带来不可预期的风险。因此,在未来的司法适用以及可能的立法修订中,必须明确承认代孕协议的效力。

关键词: 代孕, 代孕协议, 法律行为, 公序良俗, 生育权

Abstract: The validity of surrogate pregnancy agreement,in China’s academic and judicial circles,has aroused great controversy. In essence,the surrogacy agreement is one of the categories of legal action,so the validity theory of legal actions can be applied to the cognizance of its validity. Traditionally,however,surrogacy agreement is regarded as invalid because it violates administrative rules or the principle of public order and good social customs. This view seems to be consistent with the theory,but in essence it is inconsistent with the spirit of legislation and the social reality. In fact,the surrogacy agreement not only conforms to legal action’s essentials of legitimacy,but also does not violate the connotation of the principles of public order. If the validity of the surrogacy agreement is denied,then this will bring unpredictable risks to the parties of the agreement. Therefore,in the future judicial application and possible legislative amendments,the validity of the surrogacy agreement must be clearly recognized.

Key words: surrogacy, surrogacy agreement, legal behavior, public order and customs, procreation right

中图分类号: