江汉学术 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 12-17.doi: 10.16388/j.cnki.cn42-1843/c.2018.04.002

• 艺术专栏_艺术史论新视野 • 上一篇    下一篇

论中国早期电影评论中的“西学中源”思潮——探究“影戏源流中土”的偏执论证

赵 轩   

  1. 上海大学 上海电影学院,上海 200072
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-12 修回日期:2018-04-12 出版日期:2018-08-15 发布日期:2018-07-16
  • 作者简介:赵 轩,男,江苏徐州人,上海大学上海电影学院博士生,南京航空航天大学金城学院讲师。

On the Ideological Trend of“Western Learning Comes from China”in China’s Early Period of Film Review:A Study of the Self-conceited“Shadow Plays’Chinese Origin”Argument

ZHAO Xuan   

  1. Shanghai Film Academy, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072
  • Received:2018-04-12 Revised:2018-04-12 Online:2018-08-15 Published:2018-07-16

摘要: 在中国早期电影评论中,“影戏源流中土”的观点一度很有市场,古时的汉武帝影灯、宋代影戏,以致当时的滦州影戏和走马灯均成为此论拥趸者借机发挥的凭证。这实则是“西学中源”思潮在电影批评界的投影。“影戏源流中土”的论证,从一开始就蹈入了一种文化偏执,一种以外来事物的运作范式投射中华传统,却又要维系自身传统文化源远流长的复杂心态。这其间的削足适履与刻意抬高不可避免。但值得肯定的是,慨叹影戏虽缘出中国,却未在国人手中发扬光大,本身也是此时论者呼吁中国影业的自强自立的一种话语策略。

关键词: 早期电影, 电影批评, 西学中源, 影戏

Abstract: In the early period, the idea of“shadow play’s Chinese origin”was very popular in film reviews:the Han dynasty’s image lamps, the Song dynasty’s shadow plays, and even the shadow shows and revolving picture-lanterns in Luanzhou of the time were used as evidence. This is actually a reflection of Chinese film critics’ideology, which argues that“Western learning comes from China”. This idea from the very beginning falls into a biased cultural self-conceitedness, revealing a complicated mentality - trying to maintain the historical and traditional culture while using foreign modes to examine the Chinese tradition.“Cutting one’s toes to fit the shoes”and deliberately elevating oneself are both inevitable. ecognizing the fact that shadow plays come from China but unfortunately are not carried forward and advanced to filmmaking is an attitude worthy of appreciation. It is also this paper’s discourse strategy to encourage the Chinese filmmaking industry to become stronger and more independent.

Key words: early-period filmmaking, film criticism, “Western learning comes from China”, shadow play

中图分类号: