江汉学术 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 94-100.doi: 10.16388/j.cnki.cn42-1843/c.2018.01.012

• 哲 学 • 上一篇    下一篇

阿马蒂亚·森的贫困理论及其方法论启示

任付新   

  1. 东南大学 人文学院,南京211189
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-04 修回日期:2018-04-04 出版日期:2018-02-15 发布日期:2018-01-18
  • 作者简介:任付新,男,山东高唐人,东南大学人文学院博士生。

Inspirations of Amartya Sen’s Theory of Poverty and Its Methodology

REN Fuxin   

  1. School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189
  • Received:2018-04-04 Revised:2018-04-04 Online:2018-02-15 Published:2018-01-18

摘要: 阿马蒂亚·森摆脱贫困研究的传统供求模式,基于实证研究,提出了关于贫困的权利理论,指出贫困并不仅仅指收入不足,而是权利的失败所导致的。森在《贫困与饥荒》中使用权利方法对饥饿和贫困问题进行研究。但是,权利方法依然是经济领域内的考察。森进一步提出“以自由看待发展”的伦理发展观,从人们实际享有的自由出发,以“可行能力”作为衡量人类发展综合性评价标准,关注底层人民的利益。森的贫困理论开启了对贫困问题研究的多维视角,对于解决中国贫困问题具有强烈的现实意义。

关键词: 阿玛蒂亚·森, 贫困问题, 公共行为, 实质自由, 可行能力

Abstract: Putting aside the traditional supply-demand model in the study of poverty, Amartya Sen, based on empirical study, put forward his entitlement theory and defines poverty as the result of entitlement failure rather than just insufficient income. In his Poverty and Famine, he used the entitlement method to study hunger and poverty, but this approach was still confined within the economic field. He then put forward the view of ethical development——“development as freedom”. This view, from the actual freedom people have, uses“feasible capabilities”to measure human development, paying attention to the wellbeing of the people at the bottom of the society. Sen’s theory has opened the multidimensional perspective of research on poverty and it has strong practical significance to solving China’s property problem.

Key words: Amartya Sen, poverty, public action, substantive freedom, feasible capability

中图分类号: