江汉学术 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 5-15.doi: 10.16388/j.cnki.cn42-1843/c.2024.06.001

• 法律专栏_法治中国建设的新视域与新话语 • 上一篇    

生成式人工智能与著作权法:法律挑战与未来展望

李依琳   

  1. 上海对外经贸大学 国际经贸创新与治理研究院,上海 200336
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-22 出版日期:2024-12-15 发布日期:2024-11-27
  • 作者简介:李依琳,女,江苏苏州人,上海对外经贸大学国际经贸创新与治理研究院讲师,博士,E-mail: 19110270005@fudan.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市智库青年领军人才专项课题“知识产权制度型开放中的风险预警机制研究”(2024TRC014);国家社科基金重大项目“构建人类命运共同体国际法治创新研究”(18ZDA153);国家社科基金重点项目“‘人类命运共同体’国际法理论与实践研究”(18AFX025)

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law:Legal Challenges and Prospects

LI Yilin   

  1. Institute for International Economic and Trade Innovation and Governance,Shanghai University of International Business and Economics,Shanghai 200336
  • Received:2024-06-22 Online:2024-12-15 Published:2024-11-27

摘要: 生成式人工智能基于对现有作品的学习极大地降低了人类的创作成本。虽然现有的法律可以回答生成式人工智能带来的大部分与著作权相关的问题,但答案可能并不符合受生成式人工智能影响的创作者们的预期。尤其是对合理使用原则的判断,不同国家法院、法官的判决是不同的。除了生成式人工智能的学习阶段,它产生的输出结果也可能是可以被授予著作权的。考虑到生成的作品与人类作者之间错综复杂的关系以及数字内容分发的全球性,与生成式人工智能有关的著作权规则亟须在国内和国际层面做出更新,而不是仅仅依靠判例来阐明。

关键词: 生成式人工智能, 著作权, 著作权法, 合理使用原则, 机器学习

Abstract: Based on the learning of existing works,generative AI greatly reduces the cost of human creation.While existing laws can answer most of the copyright-related questions posed by generative AI,the answers may not match the expectations of creators affected by generative AI. In particular,judgments on the principle of fair use are different in courts and legal cases of different countries. In addition to the learning phase of a generative AI,the output it produces may also be copyrighted. Since the relationship between AI generated works and human authors is complex and the digital content is globally distributed,copyright rules related to generative AI need to be updated at the national and international levels,rather than relying solely on judicial precedents for clarification.

Key words: generative artificial intelligence(GAI), copyright, Copyright Law, fair use principle, machine learning

中图分类号: