“理欲之辩”的近代价值嬗变——以康有为“理欲观”为中心的考察

江汉学术 ›› 2011, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 99-102.

“理欲之辩”的近代价值嬗变——以康有为“理欲观”为中心的考察

李强华

上海海洋大学人文学院，上海201306

收稿日期:2010-11-27 出版日期:2011-04-01 发布日期:2014-01-02
作者简介:李强华(1975-)，男，安徽寿县人，上海海洋大学人文学院副教授，博士，主要从事公共伦理学研究
基金资助:
2009年度上海市教育委员会科研创新项目“中国近代价值观的嬗变:以康有为人道观为例”[09YS284]

The Value of “Argument for the Rational Desire” Transformation in Modern China:An Examination with the Concept of “Argument for the Rational Desire” from Kang Youwei

LI Qiang-hua

School of Humanities, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201300,China

Received:2010-11-27 Online:2011-04-01 Published:2014-01-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 康有为提出“天欲人理”说对宋儒“天理人欲”说给予反驳，在新的历史时期对传统“理欲之辩”做出新的诠释表征了近代价值观的变革。康有为对欲望的肯定是建立在价值观变革和现代化进程双层基础之上的一方面，从价值观变革来看，针对宋明儒学过度压制人的感性欲望，康有为高度肯定了人的欲望的合理性，其近代启蒙意义不能抹杀；另一方面，从现实生活来说，近代工业化与现代化进程中的物质进步为享乐主义和消费主义提供了可能性。康有为对欲望的无限追求有其局限性，人的欲望无限膨胀会破坏人与自然、人与社会、人与自身关系的和谐，导致彼此间的紧张和冲突，而化解这种紧张并非靠康氏的“仁”之德性所能解决。

关键词: 康有为, 理欲之辩, 中国近代哲学, 价值观

Abstract: Kang raised the “natural desire and personal reason” to contradict the “natural reason and personal desire” of Confucian in Song Dynasty., in the new historical period to identify new interpretation of the “Argument for the Rational Desire”, it showed the values change in modern period. Kang Youwei confirmed the desire which were based on value change and modernization process. For values changing, Kang Youwei confirmed the rational desire because Confucianism in Song and Ming highly suppressed human's perceptional desire. Its modern significance could not be ignored; on the other hand, in reality, the industrialization and modernization of the progress of the hedonism provided the possibility of the infinite. Kang had his limitation to pursue the desire , and the infinite expansion of person’s desire destroyed the relationship of harmony between the man and nature, man and society, man and man, which caused the tension and conflict, the tension could not be dissolved by Kang Youwei’s “benevolence”.

Key words: Kang Youwei, Argument for the Rational Desire, Modern China, Concept of value

中图分类号:

B258

李强华. “理欲之辩”的近代价值嬗变——以康有为“理欲观”为中心的考察[J]. 江汉学术, 2011, 30(2): 99-102.

LI Qiang-hua. The Value of “Argument for the Rational Desire” Transformation in Modern China:An Examination with the Concept of “Argument for the Rational Desire” from Kang Youwei[J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2011, 30(2): 99-102.

[1]	刘成斌，张晏郡. 向体制内卷：疫情风险对大学生就业价值观的影响[J]. 江汉学术, 2021, 40(4): 5-13.
[2]	李娉. 体用视野下的社会主义核心价值观研究[J]. 江汉学术, 2019, 38(5): 62-68.
[3]	苏海生，孙秀民. 社会主义核心价值观的图像叙事研究[J]. 江汉学术, 2019, 38(1): 118-123.
[4]	丁宁宁，袁玥. 全面二孩政策背景下二胎生育意愿的价值取向分析[J]. 江汉学术, 2018, 37(2): 41-48.
[5]	沈江平. 社会主义核心价值观基本范畴中的三大关系考量[J]. 江汉学术, 2017, 36(4): 117-123.
[6]	王建明. 道家价值观、环境情感和消费碳减排行为研究[J]. 江汉学术, 2016, 35(6): 5-13.
[7]	罗贵绒. 论康有为、谭嗣同对现代平等观念的接受与误读[J]. 江汉学术, 2016, 35(5): 96-102.
[8]	薛子燕. 民国初年康有为孔教思想的转向与特点[J]. 江汉学术, 2014, 33(4): 93-98.
[9]	梁小静. 诗人的“主观个体”与萧开愚的“综合意识”[J]. 江汉学术, 2014, 33(1): 62-69.
[10]	蒙云龙. 论全球化背景下中国共产党的意识形态建设[J]. 江汉学术, 2012, 31(5): 44-48.
[11]	张子清. 论美国后垮掉派诗歌[J]. 江汉学术, 2012, 31(2): 11-16.
[12]	李强华. 康有为政治发展观的人道主义向度[J]. 江汉学术, 2009, 28(6): 88-91.
[13]	周涛. 曾国藩军事伦理思想初探[J]. 江汉学术, 2009, 28(6): 98-103.
[14]	郭荣刚，王坚德. 犹太教与以色列国家价值观的形成[J]. 江汉学术, 2009, 28(2): 97-103.