《文选》再选本说献疑

江汉学术 ›› 2009, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 85-88.

《文选》再选本说献疑

谢海林

南京大学文学院,南京210093

收稿日期:2008-09-26 出版日期:2009-02-01 发布日期:2013-12-26
作者简介:谢海林(1979-),男,江西吉安人,南京大学文学院博士生,研究方向中国古代文学。

Dowbts About Reasons for Reselecting Literary Selection

XIE Hai-lin

School of Literature,Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093,China

Received:2008-09-26 Online:2009-02-01 Published:2013-12-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 《文选》再选本说影响深远。但从《文选》所录作品之同篇异名的复杂现象来看,难以成为《文选》乃据前贤总集再选编而非作者别集选录的内证。《文选》所录诗文的部分作品存在着同篇异名、多名,甚至“因类改名”现象,亦有采自时文名篇、经史之文等的可能,由此可推断出《文选》再选本说并不坚确。较为妥当的说法当是初选与再选的合选本,其作品编录来源多样,既有总集、别集及单篇者,又含有史、经二部之作。

关键词: 《文选》, 再选本说, 同篇异名, 合选本

Abstract: Literary Selection exerts a far-reaching influence. Complicated are the couses for different names of the same works, and the claim that the works in the selection are taken from a general selection is by no means exact. Various are the origins of the works.

Key words: Literary Selection, different names of the same works, combined selection

中图分类号:

I211

谢海林. 《文选》再选本说献疑[J]. 江汉学术, 2009, 28(1): 85-88.

XIE Hai-lin. Dowbts About Reasons for Reselecting Literary Selection[J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2009, 28(1): 85-88.

[1]	力之. 关于《文选》选文的下限问题——“天监十二年”说与“只取决于诗文的作年”说异议[J]. 江汉学术, 2008, 27(2): 47-51.
[2]	力之. 综论《文选》的编者问题(中)——从情理层面上辨“刘孝绰等撰”^①说不能成立[J]. 江汉学术, 2005, 24(6): 41-48.
[3]	力之. 关于姚鼐章学诚批评《文选》分类之得失问题——兼论“七”、“设论”与赋的关系[J]. 江汉学术, 2004, 23(3): 81-86.