江汉学术 ›› 2006, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 62-65.

• 文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“稻草人主义”与童话的逻辑

程世波   

  1. 重庆工商大学文学与新闻学院,重庆400067
  • 收稿日期:2005-09-11 出版日期:2006-02-01 发布日期:2013-12-16
  • 作者简介:程世波(1971-),男,四川广安人,重庆工商大学文学与新闻学院教师,四川大学文学与新闻学院博士生,主要从事文艺美学与中国现当代文学研究。

“Scarecrowism” and Logic of Children’s Stories

CHENG Shi-bo   

  1. College of Literature Communication,Chongqing Industrial Commercial University, Chongqing 400067,China
  • Received:2005-09-11 Online:2006-02-01 Published:2013-12-16

摘要: 鲁迅认为“《稻草人》是给中国的童话开了一条自己创作的路”,后来我们大都把这条路理解成为现实主义的道路,有人甚至将其命名为“稻草人主义”。无论是从鲁迅对儿童文学的认识,还是从《稻草人》这部童话集内在特性来看,都可以衍生出这种说法。惟其如此,我们不能将具有强烈现实主义精神的《稻草人》当作童话来看待,因为它所遵循的是事理逻辑而非情感逻辑,并且缺乏童话中的必要的行动性因素。对“稻草人主义”的过分强调,在很大程度上阻碍了国内童话创作想象力的伸展,我们今天必须理性地看待这一问题。

关键词: 现实主义, 稻草人主义, 事理逻辑, 情感逻辑, 行动性

Abstract: Lu Xun held that “Scarecrow opens up a path for the creation of China’s own children’s stories”. Later people understood the path as of realism, some even named it as “scarecrowism”. From the point of view either of Lu Xun’s knowledge of children’s literature or of the inner characteristics of Scarecrow, the anthology of children’s stories, such a statement can well be derived.Just because of this, Scarecrow, which is full of strong realistic spirit,can not be taken as ordinary children’s stories. For what it follows is the logic of reason, not that of emotion. Besides, it is short of the necessary act nature in children’s stories. Over emphasis on “scarecrowism” has, to a great degree, prevented the creative imagination of childrens stories from stretching. Such should now be sensibly regarded.

Key words: realism, scarecrowism, logic of reason, logic ofemotion, act nature

中图分类号: