综论《文选》的编者问题(上)——从文献可信度层面上辨“与刘孝绰等撰”说不能成立

江汉学术 ›› 2005, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 33-40.

综论《文选》的编者问题(上)——从文献可信度层面上辨“与刘孝绰等撰”说不能成立

力之

广西师范大学中文系, 广西桂林 541004

收稿日期:2004-11-03 出版日期:2005-01-01 发布日期:2013-12-11
作者简介:力之(1956-), 男, 广西北海人, 广西师范大学中文系教授, 文学硕士, 主要从事唐前文学研究。

Comprehensively On Compliers of Anchology

LI Zhi

The Chinese Department of Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004,Guangxi,China

Received:2004-11-03 Online:2005-01-01 Published:2013-12-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 《古今诗人秀句序》的“昭明太子萧统与刘孝绰等撰集《文选》”与《中兴书目》注的昭明太子“与何逊、刘孝绰等撰集”《文选》说,是被学林普遍用以证明《文选》为萧统与刘孝绰等编纂一说最主要的“客观材料”,但是这两条“客观材料”是没有从文献可信度层面辨析的。其说难以成立。《文选》只能是昭明太子一己之所撰。

关键词: 文选, 编者问题, 文献可信度, 《古今诗人秀句序》, 《中兴书目》小注

Abstract: Gujin Shiren Xiuju Xu “Xiaotong, Prince Zhaoming, Liu Xiaochuo and other people compiled Wenxuan ” quoted from Preface to The Refined Sentences Of Ancient And Modern Poets and “Prince Zhaoming, He Xun and Liu Xiaochuo compiled Wenxuan together” annotated in Resurgence Bibliography are the main objective materials cited by most scholars to prove that Xiaotong, Liu Xiaochuo and other people are the compilers of Wenxuan , which, however, is not discriminatively analyzed from the aspect of the fidelity of literature. The two objective materials prove to be untenable if analyzed from the aspect of the fidelity of literature. Wenxuan is not compiled by Prince Zhaoming, Liu Xiaochuo and other people but by Prince Zhaoming alone.

Key words: Wenxuan, complier, the fidelity of literature, Preface To The Refined Sentences Of Ancient And Modern Poets, note from Resurgence Bibliograph

中图分类号:

I206.2

力之. 综论《文选》的编者问题(上)——从文献可信度层面上辨“与刘孝绰等撰”说不能成立[J]. 江汉学术, 2005, 24(1): 33-40.

LI Zhi. Comprehensively On Compliers of Anchology[J]. JIANGHAN ACADEMIC, 2005, 24(1): 33-40.

参考文献

[1] 曹道衡.汉魏六朝文学论文集[C] .桂林:广西师范大学出版社,1999.
[2] 王利器.文镜秘府论校注[M] .北京:中国社会科学出版社,1983.
[3] 中国文选学研究会郑州大学古籍整理研究所编.文选学新论[C] .郑州:中州古籍出版社,1997.
[4] 穆克宏.昭明文选研究[M] .北京:人民文学出版社,1998.
[5] 傅刚.《昭明文选》研究[M] .北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
[6] 力之.关于《文选》编目次第之“彼此失照”问题[J] .广西师范大学学报,2004,(1).
[7] 萧统.文选[C] .北京:中华书局,1977(李注胡刻本).
[8] 吴则虞.晏子春秋集释[M] .北京:中华书局,1962.
[9] 焦循.孟子正义[M] .北京:中华书局,1987.
[10] 陈奇猷.吕氏春秋校释[M] .上海:学林出版社,1984.
[11] 何宁.淮南子集释[M] .北京:中华书局,1998.
[12] 王先谦.后汉书集解:下[M] .北京:中华书局,1984（影印本）.
[13] 刘昫.旧唐书[M] .北京:中华书局,1975.
[14] 萧统.文选[C] .上海:商务印书馆（《四部丛刊》影宋“六臣注”本）.
[15] [英] 罗素.西方哲学史:上卷[M] .北京:商务印书馆,1963.
[16] 力之.关于《文选》的编者问题[J] .文学评论,1999,(1).
[17] 澁江全善,森立之.经籍访古志[M] .光绪11年,徐承祖本.
[18] 屈守元.《文选》导读[M] .成都:巴蜀书社,1993.
[19] 傅刚.《文选》版本研究[M] .北京:北京大学出版社,2000.
[20] 何文焕.历代诗话:上[M] .北京:中华书局,1981.
[21] 四库全书[Z] .上海:上海古籍出版社,1987(影印文渊阁本).
[22] 王象之.舆地纪胜[Z] .北京:中华书局,1992（据道光二十九年刊板影印）.
[23] 高步瀛.文选李注义疏[M] .北京:中华书局,1985.
[24] 方师铎.传统文学与类书之关系[M] .天津:天津古籍出版社,1986（影印1971年本）.
[25] 袁枚.随园诗话[M] .北京:人民文学出版社,1982.
[26] 李锦全.陶潜评传[M] .南京:南京大学出版社,1998.
[27] 沈玉成.《文选》的选录标准[J] .文学遗产,1984,(2).
[28] 洪兴祖.楚辞补注[M] .北京:中华书局,1983.
[29] 姜亮夫.楚辞学论文集[C] .上海:上海古籍出版社,1984.
[30] 俞绍初,许逸民.中外学者文选学论集:[C] .北京:中华书局,1998.
[31] 赵福海,等.昭明文选研究论文集[C] .长春:吉林文史出版社,1988.
[32] 刘师培.中国中古文学史[M] .北京:人民文学出版社,1959.
[33] 王利器.文心雕龙校证[M] .上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
[34] 丁福保.历代诗话续编:中[M] .北京:中华书局,1983.
[35] 许学夷.诗源辩体[M] .北京:人民文学出版社,1987.
[36] 张涤华.历代诗文总集选介[M] .上海:上海古籍出版社,1985.
[37] 许逸民.《文选》编撰年代新说[J] .文学遗产,2000,(4).
[38] 王利器.颜氏家训集解[M] .上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
[39] 王重民.敦煌遗书论文集[C] .北京:中华书局,1984.
[40] 赵福海,等.《昭明文选》与中国传统文化[C] .长春:吉林文史出版社,2001.