江汉学术 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 62-71.doi: 10.16388/j.cnki.cn42-1843/c.2025.0918.001

• 法律专栏_法治中国建设的新视域与新话语 • 上一篇    下一篇

网络服务提供者版权注意义务的范围界定

黄鸿瑜   

  1. 浙江工商大学 法学院,杭州 310000
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-16 出版日期:2025-12-15 发布日期:2025-11-26
  • 作者简介:黄鸿瑜,女,福建泉州人,浙江工商大学法学院博士生,E-mail:hhongyu7991@163.com。

Scope of Copyright Notice Obligations of Network Service Providers

HUANG Hongyu   

  1. School of Law,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300134
  • Received:2025-06-16 Online:2025-12-15 Published:2025-11-26

摘要: 从立法、学理和司法三个维度看,现行立法对网络服务提供者版权注意义务规定不明,学界相关讨论存在较大的分歧,司法实践中“避风港”规则的局限性明显,从而造成网络服务提供者版权注意义务的范围界定存在较大的困难。鉴于此,应坚持利益平衡原则,合理确定网络服务提供者版权保护义务;坚持技术中立原则,避免过度限缩网络服务提供者的免责空间。一方面,应完善“通知—删除”规则:明确“合格的通知”的界定标准,将“转通知”有条件地纳为必要措施,明确网络服务提供者对不合格的“通知”无核实义务,确定“示警红旗”和“制止措施”的判断标准。另一方面,应明确“应知”和“明知”的认定标准:当网络服务提供者未及时采取预防措施或未设置醒目的举报反馈通道或未遵守行业准则和法定监管职责,可以被推定为“应知”;当网络服务提供者收到合格的“通知”或自认知道用户存在侵权事实或教唆用户侵权,可以被认定为“明知”。

关键词: 网络服务提供者, 避风港规则, 通知删除规则, 注意义务

Abstract: Online civil trials still encounter difficulties or controversies in aspects such as whether they comply with the principle of direct and verbal trial,the applicable conditions,the procedural operation,and the rules for the use of electronic physical evidence. Regarding the controversy over whether online trials comply with the principle of direct and verbal trial,it should be clarified that the same physical space is not a necessary condition for the realization of this principle. In order to implement the principle,it is necessary to require judges to identify whether an online trial can be applied to a case,ensure the clarity and stability of audio-visual transmission,promote centralized trials through full recording,restrict the application of combined online and offline trial methods, and also make requirements for the interactive mode of asynchronous online trials. Synchronous online trial is the common form of online court proceedings. For the applicable conditions,it should be clearly stipulated that the convenience of the parties should be the priority,the consent rules for the parties should be optimized,and the negative conditions should be refined.As an exception,online asynchronous trial should only be applicable to small-claim cases,and it should not be applied if one party remains silent after the judge recommends this method. During the trial process,the court’s functions of clarification,guidance,and procedural control should be fully exerted. The mechanisms for maintaining courtroom order and ensuring the seriousness of court proceedings should be further improved.In terms of submitting electronic physical evidence,the rules for parties’objections should be refined,and clear authentication rules should be established. For cases where the original evidence or the original object needs to be submitted,offline cross-examination should generally be organized.

Key words: online court trial, the principle of direct and verbal trial, asynchronous online trial, electronic physical evidence

中图分类号: